Delivering trusted services with international capability and local presence. Begin your journey with clear guidance and expert support.
Start with the essentials and we'll guide you.
A corporate inventory, a future emissions-reduction project and a product carbon footprint are not the same assurance subject.
The boundary, calculation method, materiality, evidence trail, reporting period and intended users all influence the work required. A precise request prevents an assurance exercise from answering the wrong question.
Check whether the evidence is readyDefine the inventory, claim, projection, project result or product footprint that requires independent assessment.
Name the standard, programme, contractual requirement, reporting framework or calculation methodology.
Identify whether the output supports management, customers, investors, procurement, a programme or another defined audience.
This distinction helps determine whether validation, verification or another form of review is relevant.
The route finder helps frame the initial enquiry. The final scope is agreed after reviewing the statement, criteria and evidence.
Use this route when an organisation has quantified emissions for a defined reporting period and organisational boundary.
Submit this scopeThese terms are related, but they are not interchangeable. The applicable criteria remain the deciding reference.
Validation typically examines whether assumptions, methods, plans or projected outcomes are reasonable for an intended future use.
Verification typically examines a completed statement or reported data for a defined period against the applicable criteria and available evidence.
The terminology, assurance level, materiality and final conclusion must follow the applicable standard or programme—not a website summary.
The list below is orientation only. Inclusion does not mean every criterion is available within TNV Global Limited’s current scope.
Commonly used for quantifying and reporting greenhouse gas emissions and removals at organisational level.
Commonly used for project-level quantification, monitoring and reporting of emissions reductions or removal enhancements.
Provides principles and requirements for validating or verifying greenhouse gas statements.
Commonly used for quantifying and reporting the greenhouse gas footprint of a product across a defined life cycle.
A widely used accounting framework for organisational inventories and value-chain emissions reporting.
Use the exact programme, methodology or contractual criteria in the scope request so it can be reviewed directly.
Ask the Italy team to review the criteria →Select the evidence areas already available. This does not determine conformity; it helps identify what may need clarification before a quotation or assurance plan can be prepared.
Start with the statement and applicable criteria.
A useful evidence trail explains where the data came from, how it was converted, which controls were applied and where professional judgement or estimation affected the result.
The established six-stage interaction is reused so visitors encounter one consistent service journey across the website.
Share the statement, methodology, supporting files, boundary, reporting period and intended purpose.
Identify missing information and confirm whether validation, verification or another route should be considered.
A request that can move into competence, scope and commercial review.
The exact documents depend on the criteria and agreed engagement. The elements below explain the type of information a well-defined assurance file should make visible.
The statement, boundary, reporting period, criteria, assurance level, materiality and intended users.
Risk focus, evidence approach, sampling, site or remote activity and responsible contacts.
Records reviewed, tests performed, inconsistencies identified and matters requiring correction or explanation.
Corrections, clarifications and final evidence submitted before the conclusion is reached.
A statement or opinion written in the form required by the applicable criteria, including scope and limitations.
Different users may need different assurance language, evidence depth and timing. The enquiry should identify who will rely on the output and for what decision.
Independent assessment may be requested before information is shared with stakeholders or included in a wider report.
Customers may request an assessed inventory, product footprint or programme-specific statement.
The scope must reflect the exact reporting condition or information need established by the relevant party.
The programme rules, assurance level, reporting template and eligibility conditions should be supplied at the start.
The Italy contact route can help collect the initial statement, reporting criteria, supporting files and timing. Technical suitability, competence, delivery arrangements and any applicable accreditation coverage are confirmed through formal scope review.
Italy officeTNV Global LimitedLargo Alessandro Lala 16
CAP 80125, Napoli (NA), Italy
These answers explain the website journey. The applicable criteria and formal engagement documents remain controlling.
Validation generally addresses prospective assumptions, plans or projected outcomes, while verification generally addresses historical data or a completed statement. The applicable criteria determine the exact meaning and required process.
An enquiry may relate to an organisational inventory, project statement, product carbon footprint or another defined programme or disclosure. Suitability and service availability are reviewed after the exact criteria are provided.
No. This page explains the possible service journey. Any accreditation coverage must be checked against the current accreditation schedule and confirmed for the exact statement and criteria during scope review.
Provide the statement, reporting period, boundary, methodology, applicable standard or programme, intended users, calculation files, principal source data and required timing.
No. Programmes may define their own eligibility, terminology, assurance level, materiality, evidence and reporting requirements. The programme rules should be supplied with the request.
Share the statement, criteria, reporting period and intended use. The request can then be assessed for the appropriate validation, verification or review route.